Most significantly, we find evidence that the changing credit regime that took place in late 2003, as the GSE’s pulled back from the market for political, regulatory, and market-based reasons [Curious Capitalist notes: they're talking about accounting scandals, caps on retained loans, etc.], is suggested to be a primary factor reducing the dominance of market fundamentals in affecting house price returns and creating the price-momentum conditions characteristic of a “bubble”. Rather than causing the run-up in house prices, the subprime market may well have been a joint product, along with house price increases, (i.e., the “tail”) of the economic, political, and regulatory environment characteristic of the early- to mid-2000’s (the “dog”).
Tuesday assorted links
-
1. Did NAFTA make America less healthy? 2. Economics-related ideas for
fixing NBA tanking (NYT). 3. Shyam Sankar. 4. Are hard courts eating the
tour? 5. ...
6 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment